{"id":2049,"date":"2023-02-07T06:38:00","date_gmt":"2023-02-07T06:38:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ewebtoolz.com\/blog\/index.php\/2023\/02\/07\/the-current-state-of-google-pagerank-how-it-evolved\/"},"modified":"2023-02-07T06:38:00","modified_gmt":"2023-02-07T06:38:00","slug":"the-current-state-of-google-pagerank-how-it-evolved","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ewebtoolz.com\/blog\/the-current-state-of-google-pagerank-how-it-evolved\/","title":{"rendered":"The Current State of Google PageRank &#038; How It Evolved"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div id=\"\">\n<p>PageRank (PR) is an algorithm that improves the quality of search results by using links to measure the importance of a page. It considers links as votes, with the underlying assumption being that more important pages are likely to receive more\u00a0links.<\/p>\n<p>PageRank was created by Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page in 1997 when they were at Stanford University, and the name is a reference to both Larry Page and the term \u201cwebpage.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>In many ways, it\u2019s similar to a metric called \u201cimpact factor\u201d for journals, where more cited = more important. It differs a bit in that PageRank considers some votes more important than others.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>By using links along with content to rank pages, Google\u2019s results were better than competitors. Links became the currency of the\u00a0web.<\/p>\n<p>Want to know more about PageRank? Let\u2019s dive\u00a0in.<\/p>\n<div class=\"post-nav-link clearfix\" id=\"section1\"><a class=\"subhead-anchor\" data-tip=\"tooltip__copielink\" rel=\"#section1\"><svg width=\"19\" height=\"19\" viewbox=\"0 0 14 14\" style=\"\"><g fill=\"none\" fill-rule=\"evenodd\"><path d=\"M0 0h14v14H0z\"\/><path d=\"M7.45 9.887l-1.62 1.621c-.92.92-2.418.92-3.338 0a2.364 2.364 0 0 1 0-3.339l1.62-1.62-1.273-1.272-1.62 1.62a4.161 4.161 0 1 0 5.885 5.884l1.62-1.62L7.45 9.886zM5.527 5.135L7.17 3.492c.92-.92 2.418-.92 3.339 0 .92.92.92 2.418 0 3.339L8.866 8.473l1.272 1.273 1.644-1.643A4.161 4.161 0 1 0 5.897 2.22L4.254 3.863l1.272 1.272zm-.66 3.998a.749.749 0 0 1 0-1.06l2.208-2.206a.749.749 0 1 1 1.06 1.06L5.928 9.133a.75.75 0 0 1-1.061 0z\" style=\"\"\/><\/g><\/svg><\/a><\/p>\n<p><h2>Google still uses PageRank<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>In terms of modern SEO, PageRank is one of the algorithms comprising <a href=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/eat-seo\/\">Experience Expertise Authoritativeness Trustworthiness (E-E-A-T)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Google\u2019s algorithms identify signals about pages that correlate with trustworthiness and authoritativeness. The best known of these signals is PageRank, which uses links on the web to understand authoritativeness.<\/p>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.google\/documents\/37\/How_Google_Fights_Disinformation.pdf\/\">How Google Fights Disinformation<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>We\u2019ve also had confirmation from Google reps like <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/methode\">Gary Illyes<\/a>, who said that Google still uses PageRank and that links are used for E-A-T (now E-E-A-T).<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter\"\/>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter\"\/>\n<p>When I ran a <a href=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/impact-of-links\/\">study to measure the impact of links<\/a> and effectively removed the links using the disavow tool, the drop was obvious. Links still matter for rankings.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1600\" height=\"1789\" src=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_1.png\" alt=\"Impact on traffic when links are disavowed\" class=\"wp-image-152621\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_1.png 1600w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_1-380x425.png 380w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_1-768x859.png 768w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_1-1374x1536.png 1374w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px\"\/><\/figure>\n<p>PageRank has also been a confirmed factor when it comes to <a href=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/crawl-budget\/\">crawl budget<\/a>. It makes sense that Google wants to crawl important pages more\u00a0often.<\/p>\n<div class=\"post-nav-link clearfix\" id=\"section1\"><a class=\"subhead-anchor\" data-tip=\"tooltip__copielink\" rel=\"#section1\"><svg width=\"19\" height=\"19\" viewbox=\"0 0 14 14\" style=\"\"><g fill=\"none\" fill-rule=\"evenodd\"><path d=\"M0 0h14v14H0z\"\/><path d=\"M7.45 9.887l-1.62 1.621c-.92.92-2.418.92-3.338 0a2.364 2.364 0 0 1 0-3.339l1.62-1.62-1.273-1.272-1.62 1.62a4.161 4.161 0 1 0 5.885 5.884l1.62-1.62L7.45 9.886zM5.527 5.135L7.17 3.492c.92-.92 2.418-.92 3.339 0 .92.92.92 2.418 0 3.339L8.866 8.473l1.272 1.273 1.644-1.643A4.161 4.161 0 1 0 5.897 2.22L4.254 3.863l1.272 1.272zm-.66 3.998a.749.749 0 0 1 0-1.06l2.208-2.206a.749.749 0 1 1 1.06 1.06L5.928 9.133a.75.75 0 0 1-1.061 0z\" style=\"\"\/><\/g><\/svg><\/a><\/p>\n<p><h2>Fun math, why the PageRank formula was\u00a0wrong\u00a0<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Crazy fact: The formula published in the original PageRank paper was wrong. Let\u2019s look at\u00a0why.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>PageRank was described in <a href=\"http:\/\/infolab.stanford.edu\/~backrub\/google.html\">the original paper<\/a> as a probability distribution\u2014or how likely you were to be on any given page on the web. This means that if you sum up the PageRank for every page on the web together, you should get a total of\u00a01.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s the full PageRank formula from the original paper published in\u00a01997:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p><strong>PR(A) = (1-d) + d (PR(T1)\/C(T1) + \u2026 + PR(Tn)\/C(Tn))<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Simplified a bit and assuming the damping factor (d) is 0.85 as Google mentioned in the paper (I\u2019ll explain what the damping factor is shortly), it\u2019s:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>PageRank for a page = 0.15 + 0.85 (a portion of the PageRank of each linking page split across its outbound links)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>In the paper, they said that the sum of the PageRank for every page should equal 1. But that\u2019s not possible if you use the formula in the paper. Each page would have a minimum PageRank of 0.15 (1-d). Just a few pages would put the total at greater than 1. You can\u2019t have a probability greater than 100%. Something is\u00a0wrong!<\/p>\n<p>The formula should actually divide that (1-d) by the number of pages on the internet for it to work as described. It would\u00a0be:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>PageRank for a page = (0.15\/number of pages on the internet) + 0.85 (a portion of the PageRank of each linking page split across its outbound links)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>It\u2019s still complicated, so let\u2019s see if I can explain it with some visuals.<\/p>\n<p>1. A page is given an initial PageRank score based on the links pointing to it. Let\u2019s say I have five pages with no links. Each gets a PageRank of (1\/5) or 0.2.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1600\" height=\"1777\" src=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_2.png\" alt=\"PageRank example of five pages with no links yet\" class=\"wp-image-152622\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_2.png 1600w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_2-383x425.png 383w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_2-768x853.png 768w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_2-1383x1536.png 1383w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px\"\/><\/figure>\n<p>2. This score is then distributed to other pages through the links on the page. If I add some links to the five pages above and calculate the new PageRank for each, then I end up with\u00a0this:\u00a0<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1600\" height=\"1777\" src=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_3.png\" alt=\"PageRank example of five pages after one iteration\" class=\"wp-image-152624\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_3.png 1600w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_3-383x425.png 383w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_3-768x853.png 768w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_3-1383x1536.png 1383w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px\"\/><\/figure>\n<p>You\u2019ll notice that the scores are favoring the pages with more links to\u00a0them.<\/p>\n<p>3. This calculation is repeated as Google crawls the web. If I calculate the PageRank again (called an iteration), you\u2019ll see that the scores change. It\u2019s the same pages with the same links, but the base PageRank for each page has changed, so the resulting PageRank is different.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1600\" height=\"1778\" src=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_4.png\" alt=\"PageRank example of five pages after two iterations\" class=\"wp-image-152625\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_4.png 1600w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_4-382x425.png 382w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_4-768x853.png 768w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_4-1382x1536.png 1382w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px\"\/><\/figure>\n<p>The PageRank formula also has a so-called \u201cdamping factor,\u201d the \u201cd\u201d in the formula, which simulates the probability of a random user continuing to click on links as they browse the\u00a0web.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Think of it like this: The probability of you clicking a link on the first page you visit is reasonably high. But the likelihood of you then clicking a link on the next page is slightly lower, and so on and so\u00a0forth.<\/p>\n<p>If a strong page links directly to another page, it\u2019s going to pass a lot of value. If the link is four clicks away, the value transferred from that strong page will be a lot less because of the damping factor.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1600\" height=\"802\" src=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/agerank-dampening-factor.png\" alt=\"Example showing PageRank damping factor\" class=\"wp-image-152628\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/agerank-dampening-factor.png 1600w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/agerank-dampening-factor-680x341.png 680w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/agerank-dampening-factor-768x385.png 768w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/agerank-dampening-factor-1536x770.png 1536w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/agerank-dampening-factor-400x200.png 400w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px\"\/><\/figure>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1600\" height=\"4458\" src=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/pagerank-history.png\" alt=\"History of PageRank\" class=\"wp-image-152629\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/pagerank-history.png 1600w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/pagerank-history-153x425.png 153w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/pagerank-history-768x2140.png 768w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/pagerank-history-551x1536.png 551w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/pagerank-history-735x2048.png 735w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px\"\/><\/figure>\n<p>The first PageRank patent was filed on January 9, 1998. It was titled \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/patents.google.com\/patent\/US6285999B1\/en\">Method for node ranking in a linked database<\/a>.\u201d<a href=\"https:\/\/www.seroundtable.com\/google-hasnt-used-pagerank-since-2006-27891.html\"> <\/a>This patent expired on January 9, 2018, and was not renewed.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Google first made PageRank public when the <a href=\"https:\/\/googlepress.blogspot.com\/2000\/03\/google-extends-award-winning-search.html\">Google Directory launched on March 15, 2000<\/a>. This was a version of the Open Directory Project but sorted by PageRank. The directory was shut down on July 25,\u00a02011.<\/p>\n<p>It was December 11, 2000, when <a href=\"https:\/\/googlepress.blogspot.com\/2000\/12\/google-launches-google-toolbar.html\">Google launched PageRank in the Google toolbar<\/a>, which was the version most SEOs obsessed over.<\/p>\n<p>This is how it looked when PageRank was included in Google\u2019s toolbar.\u00a0<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"544\" height=\"90\" src=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image7-2.png\" alt=\"PageRank 8\/10 in Google's old toolbar\" class=\"wp-image-152631\"\/><\/figure>\n<p>PageRank in the toolbar was last updated on December 6, 2013, and was finally removed on March 7,\u00a02016.<\/p>\n<p>The PageRank shown in the toolbar was a little different. It used a simple 0\u201310 numbering system to represent the PageRank. But PageRank itself is a logarithmic scale where achieving each higher number becomes increasingly difficult.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2005\/11\/more-stats\">PageRank even made its way into Google Sitemaps<\/a> (now known as Google Search Console) on November 17, 2005. It was shown in categories of high, medium, low, or N\/A. This feature was removed on October 15,\u00a02009.<\/p>\n<h3>Link spam<\/h3>\n<p>Over the years, there have been a lot of different ways SEOs have abused the system in the search for more PageRank and better rankings. Google has a whole <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/docs\/essentials\/spam-policies\">list of link schemes<\/a> that include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Buying or selling links\u2014exchanging links for money, goods, products, or services.<\/li>\n<li>Excessive link exchanges.<\/li>\n<li>Using software to automatically create links.<\/li>\n<li>Requiring links as part of a terms of service, contract, or other agreement.<\/li>\n<li>Text ads that don\u2019t use nofollow or sponsored attributes.<\/li>\n<li>Advertorials or native advertising that includes links that pass ranking credit.<\/li>\n<li>Articles, guest posts, or blogs with optimized anchor text\u00a0links.<\/li>\n<li>Low-quality directories or social bookmark links.<\/li>\n<li>Keyword-rich, hidden, or low-quality links embedded in widgets that get put on other websites.<\/li>\n<li>Widely distributed links in footers or templates. For example, hard-coding a link to your website into the WP Theme that you sell or give away for\u00a0free.<\/li>\n<li>Forum comments with optimized links in the post or signature.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The systems to combat link spam have evolved over the years. Let\u2019s look at some of the major updates.<\/p>\n<h3>Nofollow<\/h3>\n<p>On January 18, 2005, Google announced it had partnered with other major search engines to <a href=\"https:\/\/googleblog.blogspot.com\/2005\/01\/preventing-comment-spam.html\">introduce the rel=\u201cnofollow\u201d attribute<\/a>. It encouraged users to add the <a href=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/nofollow-links\/\">nofollow<\/a> attribute to blog comments, trackbacks, and referrer lists to help combat spam.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s an excerpt from Google\u2019s official statement on the introduction of nofollow:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p><em>If you\u2019re a blogger (or a blog reader), you\u2019re painfully familiar with people who try to raise their own websites\u2019 search engine rankings by submitting linked blog comments like \u201cVisit my discount pharmaceuticals site.\u201d This is called comment spam, we don\u2019t like it either, and we\u2019ve been testing a new tag that blocks it. From now on, when Google sees the attribute (rel=\u201cnofollow\u201d) on hyperlinks, those links won\u2019t get any credit when we rank websites in our search results.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Almost all modern systems use the nofollow attribute on blog comment links.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>SEOs even began to abuse nofollow\u2014because of course we did. Nofollow was used for PageRank sculpting, where people would nofollow some links on their pages to make other links stronger. Google eventually changed the system to prevent this\u00a0abuse.<\/p>\n<p>In 2009, Google\u2019s Matt Cutts confirmed that this would no longer work and that PageRank would be distributed across links even if a nofollow attribute was present (but only passed through the followed link).<\/p>\n<p>Google added <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2019\/09\/evolving-nofollow-new-ways-to-identify\">a couple more link attributes<\/a> that are more specific versions of the nofollow attribute on September 10, 2019. These included rel=\u201cugc\u201d meant to identify user-generated content and rel=\u201csponsored\u201d meant to identify links that were paid or affiliate.<\/p>\n<h3>Algorithms targeting link\u00a0spam<\/h3>\n<p>As SEOs found new ways to game links, Google worked on new algorithms to detect this\u00a0spam.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>When the original Penguin algorithm launched on April 24, 2012, it hurt a lot of websites and website owners. Google gave site owners a way to recover later that year by introducing the <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2012\/10\/a-new-tool-to-disavow-links\">disavow tool<\/a> on October 16, 2012.<\/p>\n<p>When <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2016\/09\/penguin-is-now-part-of-our-core\">Penguin 4.0<\/a> launched on September 23, 2016, it brought a welcome change to how link spam was handled by Google. Instead of hurting websites, it began devaluing spam links. This also meant that most sites no longer needed to use the disavow tool.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Google launched its first <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2021\/07\/link-tagging-and-link-spam-update\">Link Spam Update<\/a> on July 26, 2021. This recently evolved, and a <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2022\/12\/december-22-link-spam-update\">Link Spam Update<\/a> on December 14, 2022, announced the use of an AI-based detection system called SpamBrain to neutralize the value of unnatural links.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The original version of PageRank hasn\u2019t been used since 2006, according to a former Google employee. The employee said it was replaced with another less resource-intensive algorithm.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>They replaced it in 2006 with an algorithm that gives approximately-similar results but is significantly faster to compute. The replacement algorithm is the number that\u2019s been reported in the toolbar, and what Google claims as PageRank (it even has a similar name, and so Google\u2019s claim isn\u2019t technically incorrect). Both algorithms are O(N log N) but the replacement has a much smaller constant on the log N factor, because it does away with the need to iterate until the algorithm converges. That\u2019s fairly important as the web grew from ~1-10M pages to\u00a0150B+.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Remember those iterations and how PageRank kept changing with each iteration? It sounds like Google simplified that system.<\/p>\n<p>What else has changed?<\/p>\n<h3>Some links are worth more than others<\/h3>\n<p>Rather than splitting the PageRank equally between all links on a page, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.seroundtable.com\/google-footer-sitewide-links-weight-21540.html\">some links are valued more than others<\/a>. There\u2019s speculation from patents that Google switched from a random surfer model (where a user may go to any link) to a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.seobythesea.com\/2010\/05\/googles-reasonable-surfer-how-the-value-of-a-link-may-differ-based-upon-link-and-document-features-and-user-data\/\">reasonable surfer model<\/a> (where some links are more likely to be clicked than others so they carry more weight).<\/p>\n<h3>Some links are ignored<\/h3>\n<p>There have been several systems put in place to ignore the value of certain links. We\u2019ve already talked about a few of them, including:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Nofollow, UGC, and sponsored attributes.<\/li>\n<li>Google\u2019s Penguin algorithm.<\/li>\n<li>The disavow tool.<\/li>\n<li>Link Spam updates.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Google also won\u2019t count any links on pages that are blocked by <a href=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/robots-txt\/\">robots.txt<\/a>. It won\u2019t be able to crawl these pages to see any of the links. This system was likely in place from the\u00a0start.<\/p>\n<h3>Some links are consolidated<\/h3>\n<p>Google has a <a href=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/canonicalization\/\">canonicalization<\/a> system that helps it determine what version of a page should be indexed and to consolidate signals from duplicate pages to that main version.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1600\" height=\"1520\" src=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_7.png\" alt=\"Canonicalization signals\" class=\"wp-image-152633\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_7.png 1600w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_7-447x425.png 447w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_7-768x730.png 768w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/page_rank_7-1536x1459.png 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px\"\/><\/figure>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2009\/02\/specify-your-canonical\">Canonical link elements<\/a> were introduced on February 12, 2009, and allow users to specify their preferred version.<\/p>\n<p>Redirects were originally said to pass the same amount of PageRank as a link. But at some point, this system changed and no PageRank is currently lost.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">30x redirects don\u2019t lose PageRank anymore.<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Gary \u9be8\u7406\uff0f\uacbd\ub9ac Illyes (@methode) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/methode\/status\/757923179641839616?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">July 26,\u00a02016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<h3>A bit is still unknown<\/h3>\n<p>When pages are marked as <a href=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/seo\/glossary\/noindex-tag\">noindex<\/a>, we don\u2019t exactly know how Google treats the links. Even Googlers have conflicting statements.<\/p>\n<p>According to John Mueller, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.seroundtable.com\/google-long-term-noindex-follow-24990.html\">pages that are marked noindex will eventually be treated as noindex, nofollow<\/a>. This means that the links eventually stop passing any\u00a0value.<\/p>\n<p>According to Gary, <a href=\"https:\/\/i.reddit.com\/r\/TechSEO\/comments\/ao3fmk\/i_am_gary_illyes_googles_chief_of_sunshine_and\/efyjmau\/\">Googlebot will discover and follow the links as long as a page still has links to it<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>These aren\u2019t necessarily contradictory. But if you go by Gary\u2019s statement, it could be a very long time before Google stops crawling and counting links\u2014perhaps never.<\/p>\n<div class=\"post-nav-link clearfix\" id=\"section1\"><a class=\"subhead-anchor\" data-tip=\"tooltip__copielink\" rel=\"#section1\"><svg width=\"19\" height=\"19\" viewbox=\"0 0 14 14\" style=\"\"><g fill=\"none\" fill-rule=\"evenodd\"><path d=\"M0 0h14v14H0z\"\/><path d=\"M7.45 9.887l-1.62 1.621c-.92.92-2.418.92-3.338 0a2.364 2.364 0 0 1 0-3.339l1.62-1.62-1.273-1.272-1.62 1.62a4.161 4.161 0 1 0 5.885 5.884l1.62-1.62L7.45 9.886zM5.527 5.135L7.17 3.492c.92-.92 2.418-.92 3.339 0 .92.92.92 2.418 0 3.339L8.866 8.473l1.272 1.273 1.644-1.643A4.161 4.161 0 1 0 5.897 2.22L4.254 3.863l1.272 1.272zm-.66 3.998a.749.749 0 0 1 0-1.06l2.208-2.206a.749.749 0 1 1 1.06 1.06L5.928 9.133a.75.75 0 0 1-1.061 0z\" style=\"\"\/><\/g><\/svg><\/a><\/p>\n<p><h2>Can you still check your PageRank?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>There\u2019s currently no way to see Google\u2019s PageRank.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/seo\/glossary\/url-rating\">URL Rating (UR)<\/a> is a good replacement metric for PageRank because it has a lot in common with the PageRank formula. It shows the strength of a page\u2019s link profile on a 100-point scale. The bigger the number, the stronger the link profile.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image5-1.png\" alt=\"Screenshot showing UR score from Ahrefs overview 2.0\" class=\"wp-image-152635\" width=\"373\" height=\"189\"\/><\/figure>\n<p>Both PageRank and UR account for internal and external links when being calculated. Many of the other strength metrics used in the industry completely ignore internal links. I\u2019d argue link builders should be looking more at UR than metrics like DR, which only accounts for links from other\u00a0sites.<\/p>\n<p>However, it\u2019s not exactly the same. UR does ignore the value of some links and doesn\u2019t count nofollow links. We don\u2019t know exactly what links Google ignores and don\u2019t know what links users may have disavowed, which will impact Google\u2019s PageRank calculation. We also may make different decisions on how we treat some of the canonicalization signals like canonical link elements and redirects.<\/p>\n<p>So our advice is to use it but know that it may not be exactly like Google\u2019s system.<\/p>\n<p>We also have <a href=\"https:\/\/help.ahrefs.com\/en\/articles\/1667993-what-is-site-audit-s-page-rating-and-how-do-we-calculate-it\">Page Rating (PR)<\/a> in <a href=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/site-audit\">Site Audit\u2019s<\/a> Page Explorer. This is similar to an internal PageRank calculation and can be useful to see what the strongest pages on your site are based on your internal link structure.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image12-2.png\" alt=\"Page rating in Ahrefs' Site Audit\" class=\"wp-image-152637\" width=\"509\" height=\"377\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image12-2.png 678w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image12-2-573x425.png 573w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 509px) 100vw, 509px\"\/><\/figure>\n<div class=\"post-nav-link clearfix\" id=\"section1\"><a class=\"subhead-anchor\" data-tip=\"tooltip__copielink\" rel=\"#section1\"><svg width=\"19\" height=\"19\" viewbox=\"0 0 14 14\" style=\"\"><g fill=\"none\" fill-rule=\"evenodd\"><path d=\"M0 0h14v14H0z\"\/><path d=\"M7.45 9.887l-1.62 1.621c-.92.92-2.418.92-3.338 0a2.364 2.364 0 0 1 0-3.339l1.62-1.62-1.273-1.272-1.62 1.62a4.161 4.161 0 1 0 5.885 5.884l1.62-1.62L7.45 9.886zM5.527 5.135L7.17 3.492c.92-.92 2.418-.92 3.339 0 .92.92.92 2.418 0 3.339L8.866 8.473l1.272 1.273 1.644-1.643A4.161 4.161 0 1 0 5.897 2.22L4.254 3.863l1.272 1.272zm-.66 3.998a.749.749 0 0 1 0-1.06l2.208-2.206a.749.749 0 1 1 1.06 1.06L5.928 9.133a.75.75 0 0 1-1.061 0z\" style=\"\"\/><\/g><\/svg><\/a><\/p>\n<p><h2>How to improve your PageRank<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Since PageRank is based on links, to increase your PageRank, you need better links. Let\u2019s look at your options.<\/p>\n<h3>Redirect broken pages<\/h3>\n<p>Redirecting old pages on your site to relevant new pages can help reclaim and consolidate signals like PageRank. Websites change over time, and people don\u2019t seem to like to implement proper redirects. This may be the easiest win, since those links already point to you but currently don\u2019t count for\u00a0you.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s how to find those opportunities:<\/p>\n<p>I usually sort this by \u201cReferring domains.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1722\" height=\"1193\" src=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image1-2.png\" alt=\"Best by links report filtered to 404 status code to show pages you may want to redirect\" class=\"wp-image-152638\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image1-2.png 1722w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image1-2-613x425.png 613w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image1-2-768x532.png 768w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image1-2-1536x1064.png 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1722px) 100vw, 1722px\"\/><\/figure>\n<p>Take those pages and redirect them to the current pages on your site. If you don\u2019t know exactly where they go or don\u2019t have the time, I have an <a href=\"https:\/\/colab.research.google.com\/drive\/18lMkaRHK__eNM6m5FpoyhGDlDAYr3a6P\">automated redirect script<\/a> that may help. It looks at the old content from archive.org and matches it with the closest current content on your site. This is where you likely want to redirect the\u00a0pages.<\/p>\n<h3>Internal links<\/h3>\n<p>Backlinks aren\u2019t always within your control. People can link to any page on your site they choose, and they can use whatever anchor text they\u00a0like.<\/p>\n<p>Internal links are different. You have full control over\u00a0them.<\/p>\n<p>Internally link where it makes sense. For instance, you may want to link more to pages that are more important to\u00a0you.<\/p>\n<p>We have a tool within <a href=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/site-audit\">Site Audit<\/a> called <strong>Internal Link Opportunities<\/strong> that helps you quickly locate these opportunities.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>This tool works by looking for mentions of keywords that you already rank for on your site. Then it suggests them as contextual internal link opportunities.<\/p>\n<p>For example, the tool shows a mention of \u201cfaceted navigation\u201d in our guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/duplicate-content\/\">duplicate content<\/a>. As Site Audit knows we have a page about <a href=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/faceted-navigation\/\">faceted navigation<\/a>, it suggests we add an internal link to that\u00a0page.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1999\" height=\"270\" src=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image4-2.png\" alt=\"Example of an internal link opportunity\" class=\"wp-image-152640\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image4-2.png 1999w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image4-2-680x92.png 680w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image4-2-768x104.png 768w, https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image4-2-1536x207.png 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1999px) 100vw, 1999px\"\/><\/figure>\n<h3>External links<\/h3>\n<p>You can also get more links from other sites to your own to increase your PageRank. We have a lot of guides around link building already. Some of my favorites are:<\/p>\n<h2>Final thoughts<\/h2>\n<p>Even though PageRank has changed, we know that Google still uses it. We may not know all the details or everything involved, but it\u2019s still easy to see the impact of\u00a0links.<\/p>\n<p>Also, Google just can\u2019t seem to get away from using links and PageRank. It once experimented with not using links in its algorithm and decided against it.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>So we don\u2019t have a version like that that is exposed to the public but we have our own experiments like that internally and the quality looks much much worse. It turns out backlinks, even though there is some noise and certainly a lot of spam, for the most part are still a really really big win in terms of quality of search results.<\/p>\n<p>We played around with the idea of turning off backlink relevance and at least for now backlinks relevance still really helps in terms of making sure that we turn the best, most relevant, most topical set of search results.<\/p>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=NCY30WhI2og\">YouTube (Google Search Central)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>If you have any questions, message me <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/patrickstox\">on Twitter<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><script async src=\"\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><br \/>\n<br \/><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/ahrefs.com\/blog\/google-pagerank\/\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PageRank (PR) is an algorithm that improves the quality of search results by using links to measure the importance of a page. It considers links as votes, with the underlying assumption being that more important pages are likely to receive more\u00a0links. PageRank was created by Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page in 1997 when [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2050,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2049","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-seo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ewebtoolz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2049","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ewebtoolz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ewebtoolz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ewebtoolz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ewebtoolz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2049"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ewebtoolz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2049\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ewebtoolz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2050"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ewebtoolz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2049"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ewebtoolz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2049"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ewebtoolz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2049"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}